Steps for complying with 2025 state data privacy laws
Data protection
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly common in hiring, promotion and other employment decisions, states are passing laws to protect workers from algorithmic bias. In 2026, Colorado and Illinois will enforce new legislation regulating how employers use AI in employment practices, focusing on transparency, fairness and accountability.
A Traliant survey of 500 HR professionals nationwide found that 56% are using AI in their recruiting processes, while 54% are also using the technology for administrative tasks, policies, document generation and onboarding/offboarding. Almost half (49%) of respondents said they were concerned about potential AI bias and ethical risks.
In Colorado, the Anti-Discrimination in AI Law (ADAI) reflects the state’s growing commitment to managing AI risks, including employment. Beginning February 1, 2026, employers who use “high-risk” AI tools for hiring, promotions or terminations will face several new obligations:
This law emphasizes human oversight by giving employees the option to request a review of AI-driven decisions, ensuring that people — not just algorithms — play a role in shaping their careers. Smaller businesses with fewer than 50 employees are granted certain exemptions unless specific circumstances arise.
Similarly, Illinois has taken steps to protect workers from AI-driven discrimination through an amendment to the Illinois Human Rights Act (IHRA). Effective January 1, 2026, the amendment prohibits employers from using AI systems that result in unlawful discrimination, intentionally or otherwise. Even unintentional biases, such as those embedded in AI systems that rely on zip codes (which can act as proxies for race or socio-economic status) will be treated as violations.
Illinois has gone a step further by explicitly regulating generative AI tools, which simulate human-like content and decisions. Employers must notify employees and job candidates when AI influences hiring, promotion or disciplinary decisions, with further guidance on these notifications to be developed by the Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR).
While the specific requirements differ slightly between states, the message is clear: companies must be proactive in managing AI risks. Both laws demand ongoing audits and monitoring to prevent discriminatory outcomes, even if the AI software is provided by third-party vendors.
For employers, this means:
The alignment between Colorado’s ADAI and Illinois’ amended IHRA reflects a national trend. New York City has recently enacted measures addressing algorithmic discrimination in employment practices. This convergence signals that employers across the US should prepare for a new era of labor compliance focused on algorithmic transparency and fairness.
Colorado and Illinois have set the stage for a wave of AI-focused labor laws. As HR and legal teams get ready for these new regulations, it’s crucial to begin reviewing AI systems, drafting policies and establishing compliance frameworks now. Companies that act early will not only avoid potential penalties but also build trust with employees by demonstrating a commitment to responsible AI practices.
By staying ahead of these changes, your organization will be better positioned to thrive in an era where technology and compliance intersect.
Traliant’s AI in the Workplace: Acceptable Use of Generative AI Toolsai emtraining explores the risks and benefits of using generative AI at work. Through real-life examples and realistic workplace scenarios, employees learn the five key questions they need to ask before using GenAI tools and understand what is considered acceptable and responsible use in a workplace setting.
For more information on AI, download our report, “Unlocking AI: An Essential Guide for HR Professionals.”